4.5 Article

Single-step separation of bioactive flavonol glucosides from Osteomeles schwerinae by high-speed counter-current chromatography

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 33, Issue 4-5, Pages 582-586

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200900693

Keywords

High-speed counter-current chromatography; Hyperoside; Osteomeles schwerinae; Quercitrin; Rat lens aldose reductase

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine [L08010, K09030]
  2. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [K09030] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two bioactive flavonol glucosides, hyperoside and quercitrin, were successfully isolated in one step from the phytochemically unknown medicinal plant Osteomeles schwerinae by high-speed counter-current chromatography using a two-phase solvent system composed of n-hexane ethyl acetate methanol water (0.5:5.5:1.5:4.5 v/v). From 160 mg of crude extract, 2.1 mg of hyperoside (98.6% purity, 83.3% recovery) and 4.5 mg of quercitrin (99.2% purity, 81.7% recovery) were separated and then their chemical structures were identified by H-1 and C-13 NMR analysis. In addition, the isolates were subjected to an in vitro bioassay to evaluate their inhibitory activity on rat lens aldose reductase. Both quercitrin and hyperoside showed excellent inhibitory activities toward rat lens aldose reductase with the IC50 values of 0.16 and 4.33 mu M, respectively, as compared with positive control, 3,3-tetramethyleneglutaric acid (28.7 mu M). So far, chemical constituents and biological activities of O. schwerinae have never been reported. This is the first report on the chemical constituents and biological activity of this plant using semi-preparative highspeed counter-current chromatography separation technique.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available