4.5 Article

Characterization of sialylated and fucosylated glycopeptides of β2-glycoprotein I by a combination of HILIC LC and MALDI MS/MS

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 33, Issue 6-7, Pages 891-902

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200900802

Keywords

Enrichment; Glycopeptide; Glycoprofiling; HILIC; Mass spectrometry

Funding

  1. Lundbeck Foundation
  2. Danish Research Agency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Characterization of low microgram levels of glycoprotein remains a challenge due to extensive heterogeneity of the conjugated N-glycans at each individual glycosylation site. We present an optimized, sensitive workflow for glycopeptide isolation and characterization that exploits the complementary features of RP (Poros R2) and hydrophilic (zwitter-ionic hydrophilic interaction chromatography) chromatographic resins. The glycopeptide analysis workflow was applied to human beta 2-glycoprotein 1 (beta 2-GPI, apolipoprotein H), which contains multiple N-glycosylation sites. Conditions for rapid proteolytic digestion of beta 2-GPI using low-specificity proteases were optimized to detect beta 2-GPI glycopeptides by MS. We demonstrate the importance of ensuring sufficient column capacity of both hydrophobic and hydrophilic stationary phases for optimal glycoprofiling by MS. The enriched glycopeptides were characterized using MALDI quadrupole TOF MS/MS. A total of 23 glycan structures, including sialylated bi- and tri-antennary complex type glycans, were characterized at three N-glycosylation sites, namely Asn-143, Asn-174 and Asn-234, of beta 2-GPI. Further exploration of the complementary nature of RP and HILIC stationary phases for glycopeptide isolation prior to MS analysis may eventually enable systematic analysis of complex glycoprotein samples in functional proteomic research and advance our understanding of the biological role of protein glycosylation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available