4.5 Article

Getting Students Outside: Using Technology as a Way to Stimulate Engagement

Journal

JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 815-826

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10956-014-9514-8

Keywords

Attention participation framework; Engagement; Environmental education; Informal science education; iPad technology; Underrepresented middle school students

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1224051]
  2. Direct For Education and Human Resources
  3. Division Of Research On Learning [1224051] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Informal environments provide students with unique experiences that allow them to actively participate in activities while promoting a positive attitude toward and an increased interest in science. One way to enhance informal science experiences is through the integration of mobile technologies. This integration is particularly useful in engaging underrepresented students in learning science. Our informal environmental science program engages underrepresented, fifth-grade students in an informal learning environment supplemented with mobile tablet technology (iPads). The purpose of this study was to explore how fifth-grade students interacted with nature using mobile technology during a nature hike series. Participants included 55 fifth-grade students from two low-income schools. We found that students used the mobile technology to explore nature and stay engaged throughout the hike. The iPads were used as references, data collectors, and engagement tools. Students had an intense desire in returning to the site and responded positively toward interacting with nature. Prior research has indicated that students in this age group are likely to lose interest in science and the incorporation of field-friendly technology that engages students with nature, not technology alone, is a useful tool for keeping students interested in science.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available