4.6 Article

Secular trends in health-related physical fitness in Spanish adolescents The AVENA and HELENA Studies

Journal

JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages 584-588

Publisher

SPORTS MEDICINE AUSTRALIA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.03.004

Keywords

Cardiorespiratory fitness; Muscular strength; Youth; Physical activity

Categories

Funding

  1. European Community [FOOD-CT 2005-007034]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Health (FIS) [00/0015]
  3. European Union [2006120]
  4. Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (FAS)
  5. Spanish Ministry of Education [EX-2007-1124, EX-2008-0641]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analysed the secular trends in health-related physical fitness in Spanish adolescents between 2001-2002 and 2006-2007 Two repre sentative population studies were conducted 5 years apart in adolescents (12 5-17 5 years) from Zaragoza (Spain) that participated in the AVENA study in 2001-2002 and in the HELENA CSS study in 2006-2007 Both studies used the same tests to assess physical fitness the handgrip strength bent arm hang standing broad jump 4 x 10 m shuttle run and 20 m shuttle run tests Performance in 4 x 10 m shuttle run and 20 m shuttle run tests was higher in 2006-2007 (Cohen's d ranging from 0 2 to 0 4 p<0 05), whereas performance in handgrip strength and standing broad jump tests was lower in 2006-2007 (Cohen s d ranging from 0 3 to 1 1 p<0 001) Adjustment for age pubertal status fat mass fat free mass and parental education did not alter the results The odds ratio (OR) of meeting the FITNESSGRAM Standards for healthy cardiorespiratory fitness was higher in 2006-2007 in both boys (OR 95% CI 2 123 1 157-3 908) and girls (OR 95% CI 2 420 1 377-4 255) The results indicate that levels of both speed/agility and cardiorespiratory fitness were higher in 2006-2007 than in 2001-2002 whereas muscular strength components were lower in 2006-2007 (C) 2010 Sports Medicine Australia Published by Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available