4.6 Article

Effect of oral contraceptive cycle phase on performance in team sport players

Journal

JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 190-195

Publisher

SPORTS MEDICINE AUSTRALIA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.10.005

Keywords

Oral contraceptives; Sports; Oestrogens; Progestins; Muscle strength

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to examine whether common team sport performance variables (anaerobic power, reactive strength and repeat sprint ability) are affected by acute hormonal fluctuation within a monophasic oral contraceptive (OC) cycle. Ten female team sport athletes completed performance tests at three time points of a single OC cycle, during the consumption phase (CONS), early (WITH1) and late in the withdrawal phase (WITH2). Tests included drop jumps (30 cm and 45 cm heights), a counter movement jump, a 10s cycle sprint test and a 5x 6s repeated sprint cycle test. Resting endogenous serum oestradiol and progesterone concentrations were also measured. No significant differences were observed between phases for the counter movement jump and cycle tests (total work and peak power). Reactive strength measured from the 30cm drop height was significantly lower during WITH2 (162 +/- 38 cm s(-1)) compared to both CONS (177 +/- 44 cm s(-1)) and WITH1 (178 +/- 40 cm s(-1)) (p < 0.05). Reactive strength measured from the 45 cm drop height was significantly higher in CONS (178 +/- 48 cm s(-1)) compared to both WITH1 and WITH2 (161 +/- 39 cm s(-1) and 158 +/- 29 cm s(-1), respectively) (p < 0.05). Serum oestradiol levels were greater during WITH2 compared to both WITH1 and CONS (p < 0.05) but there was no difference in serum progesterone levels. The results demonstrate that for female team sport athletes, only reactive strength varied significantly throughout an OC cycle, possibly due to the action of hormones on neuromuscular timing and the stretch-shortening cycle. (C) 2007 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available