4.5 Article

Psoriatic Arthritis in Canadian Clinical Practice: The PsA Assessment in Rheumatology

Journal

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 9, Pages 1850-1853

Publisher

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.120282

Keywords

PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS; COMMUNITY CARE; TREATMENT; ACTIVITY; DAMAGE

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Rheumatology Association
  2. Krembil Foundation
  3. The Arthritis Society
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. We aimed to determine disease severity and treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in rheumatology practices in Canada through the PsA Assessment in Rheumatology (PAIR) study. Methods. Rheumatologists who were members of the Canadian Rheumatology Association were asked to complete a form for each patient addressing demographic questions, history, clinical examination, and patient-reported outcomes. Results were compared with a cohort seen in a PsA clinic during the same period. Results. From across Canada, 22 rheumatologists from 5 provinces submitted information about 233 consecutive patients with PsA [145 men (62.2%), 88 women (37.8%), mean age 53.2 yrs (+/- 12.7), 88.4% disease duration > 2 yrs]. A majority (80.7%) fulfilled ClASsification for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria, and 30% had taken no disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Clinical joint damage was documented in 60% of the patients, active skin disease in 70%, and nail lesions in 32%. Only 22% were rated as having moderate to high disease activity, while 52% were rated as low disease activity and 26% were deemed in remission. The decision was based on joint counts, patient global assessment, physician global assessment, and acute-phase reactants. Twenty-seven percent of the patients were to have their medications changed based on the current visit, the majority for inadequate response to medications. Patients in the PAIR cohort had more inflamed joints but similar damage to those in the PsA clinic. Conclusion. Patients with PsA seen in regular rheumatology practice fulfill CASPAR criteria, have active disease, and more than half have joint damage. The majority have low activity or are in remission. (First Release Aug 1 2012; J Rheumatol 2012;39:1850-3; doi:10.3899/jrheum.120282)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available