4.5 Article

Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire

Journal

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages 1304-1311

Publisher

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.081090

Keywords

FIBROMYALGIA; FIBROMYALGIA IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE; CLINICAL TRIAL; MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE SEVERITY; PAIN

Categories

Funding

  1. Pfizer Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) is a disease-specific composite instrument that measures the effect of problems experienced by patients with fibromyalgia (FM). Utilization of the FIQ in measuring, changes due to interventions in FM requires derivation of a clinically meaningful change for that instrument. Analyses were conducted to estimate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and to propose FIQ severity categories. Methods. Data from 3 similarly designed, 3-month placebo-controlled, clinical treatment trials of pregabalin 300, 450, and 600 mg/day in patients with FM were modeled to estimate the change in the mean FIQ total and stiffness items corresponding to each category on the Patient Global Impression of Change. FIQ severity categories were modeled and determined using established pain severity cutpoints as an anchor. Results. A total of 2228 patients, mean age 49 years, 93% women, with a mean baseline FIQ total score of 62 were treated in the 3 studies. Estimated MCID on a given measure were similar across the studies. In a pooled analysis the estimated MCID (95% confidence interval) was 14% (13; 15) and for FIQ stiffness it was 13% (12; 14). In the severity analysis a FIQ total score from 0 to < 39 was found to represent a mild effect, >= 39 to < 59 a moderate effect, and >= 59 to 100 a severe effect. Conclusion. The analysis indicates that a 14% change in the FIQ total score is clinically relevant, and results of these analyses should enhance the clinical utility of the FIQ in research and practice. (First Release April 15 2009: J Rheumatol 2009:36: 1304-11; doi: 10.3899/jrheum.081090)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available