4.5 Article

Fyn and CD70 Expression in CD4+T Cells from Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Journal

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 53-59

Publisher

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.090424

Keywords

SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS; CD70 EXPRESSION; CD4+T CELLS

Categories

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Scientific Research and Information Technology [N N402 2424 33]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. CD4+ T cells from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) display defective function that contributes to abnormal activation of B cells and autoantibody production. Methods. We compared the transcript and protein levels of Fyn and CD70 in CD4+ T cells from patients with SLE (n = 41) and healthy individuals (n = 34). The CD4+ T cells were isolated by positive biomagnetic separation technique. The quantitative analysis of messenger RNA was performed by reverse transcription and real-time quantitative PCR. The protein contents in the CD4+ T cells were determined by Western blotting analysis. Results. We observed significantly higher levels of Fyn (p = 0.03) and CD70 (p = 0.029) transcripts in SLE CD4+ T cells than in controls. There was a significant increase in CD70 protein levels (p < 0.0001), but not Fyn protein levels (p = 0.081) in CD4+ T cells from patients with SLE compared to healthy individuals. In the group with high disease activity [SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) >= 9], we observed a significantly higher Fyn protein content than in controls (p = 0.030). There was no correlation between Fyn and CD70 protein levels in SLE CD4+ T cells and disease activity as expressed in the SLEDAI scale. Conclusion. We confirmed previous observations of higher expression of CD70 in CD4+ T cells from patients with SLE. Our findings suggest that increased Fyn protein content in CD4+ T cells can be associated with high SLE disease activity. (First Release Dec 1 2009; J Rheumatol 2010;37:53-9; doi:10.3899/jrheum.090424)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available