4.5 Article

Sensitivity and Specificity of Ultrasonography in Early Diagnosis of Metatarsal Bone Stress Fractures: A Pilot Study of 37 Patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 8, Pages 1715-1719

Publisher

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.080657

Keywords

STRESS FRACTURE; METATARSAL BONE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; DEDICATED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SENSITIVITY

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To date, early diagnosis of stress fractures depends oil magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or bone scan scintigraphy, as radiographs are usually normal at onset of symptoms. These examinations are expensive or invasive, time-consuming, and poorly accessible. A recent report has shown the ability of ultrasonography (US) to detect early stress fractures. Our objective was to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of US versus dedicated MRI (0.2 Tesla), taken as the gold standard, ill early diagnosis of metatarsal bone stress fractures. Methods. A case-control study from November 2006 to December 2007 was performed. All consecutive patients with mechanical pain and swelling of the metatarsal region for less than 3 months and with normal radiographs were included. US and dedicated MRI examinations of the metatarsal bones were performed the same day by experienced rheumatologists with expertise in US and MRI. Reading was undertaken blind to the clinical assessment and MRI/US results. Results. Forty-one feet were analyzed oil US and dedicated MRI from 37 patients (28 women, 9 men, mean age 52.7 +/- 14.1 yrs). MRI detected 13 fractures ill 12 patients. Sensitivity of US was 83%, specificity 76%, positive predictive value 59%, and negative predictive value 92%. Positive likehood ratio was 3.45, negative likehood ratio 0.22. Conclusion. In cases of normal radiographs, US is indicated in the diagnosis of metatarsal bone stress fractures. as it is a low cost, noninvasive, rapid, and easy technique With good sensitivity and specificity. From these data, we propose a new imaging algorithm including US. (First Release July 1 2009; J Rheumatol 2009;36:1715-9; doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080657)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available