4.5 Article

Viscometric functions for noncolloidal sphere suspensions with Newtonian matrices

Journal

JOURNAL OF RHEOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages 493-510

Publisher

JOURNAL RHEOLOGY AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1122/1.4774325

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP10103414]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the results of measuring the three viscometric functions [the relative viscosity eta(r), and the first (N-1) and second (N-2) normal stress differences] for nominally monosize sphere suspensions in a silicone fluid, which is nominally Newtonian. The measurements of eta(r) and N-1 - N-2 were made with a parallel-plate rheometer, while we used the open semicircular trough method to give N-2 directly. With the trough method measurements of N-2 could be made down to a 10% concentration (phi = 0.1); measurements were continued up to 45% concentration. The trough surface shows visually that N-2 is directly proportional to the shear stress tau, and the measurements of N-2 agree quite well with the results of Zarraga et al. [J. Rheol. 44, 185-220 (2000)] in the range where concentrations overlap (0.3-0.45) and with those of later investigators. The results for N1 show greater scatter. In the range 0.1 <= phi <= 0.45, our best estimate of N-2/tau is -4.4 phi(3) and that of N-1/tau is -0.8 phi(3). Hence, the magnitude of N-2 is much greater than that of N1. Measurement uncertainties are given in the text-they depend on phi. We have also compared the new experiments with two sets of numerical simulations. There is considerable divergence, which remains to be explained, between some of the simulations and the experiments. However, agreement between experiment and some of the simulations of Bertevas et al. [Rheol. Acta 49, 53-73 (2010)] is reasonable. (C) 2013 The Society of Rheology. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1122/1.4774325]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available