4.5 Article

Rotary ultrasonic machining of carbon fiber reinforced plastic composites: An experimental study on cutting temperature

Journal

JOURNAL OF REINFORCED PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES
Volume 31, Issue 22, Pages 1516-1525

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0731684412464913

Keywords

Carbon fiber reinforced plastic composite; cutting temperature; drilling; fiber optic sensor; grinding; rotary ultrasonic machining; thermocouple

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-0900462]
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  3. Directorate For Engineering [0856204] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  5. Directorate For Engineering [0900462] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon fiber reinforced plastic composites are used in many applications due to their superior properties. Drilling is the most frequently used machining process due to the need for assembly of carbon fiber reinforced plastic parts in mechanical structures. Rotary ultrasonic machining has been successfully used in drilling carbon fiber reinforced plastic composites. Reported investigations on rotary ultrasonic machining of carbon fiber reinforced plastic cover several output variables (including cutting force, torque, surface roughness, material removal rate, fiber delamination, tool wear, and power consumption). However, there are no reported studies on cutting temperature in rotary ultrasonic machining of carbon fiber reinforced plastic. This paper presents an experimental study on cutting temperature in rotary ultrasonic machining of carbon fiber reinforced plastic using two measurement methods (thermocouple and fiber optic sensor). Comparisons between these two methods are made and relations between input variables (ultrasonic power, tool rotation speed, and feedrate) and cutting temperature are experimentally determined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available