4.5 Article

THE RELATIVE EFFECT OF COPING STRATEGY AND DEPRESSION ON HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS IN THE CHRONIC PHASE AFTER STROKE

Journal

JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 514-519

Publisher

FOUNDATION REHABILITATION INFORMATION
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1803

Keywords

stroke; rehabilitation; coping; depression; quality of life

Funding

  1. Kinder Fonds Adriaanstichting (Children's Fund Adriaanstichting) [07.03.28-2007/0082]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate the relative associations of coping strategy and depression on health-related quality of life in patients in the chronic phase after stroke. Design: Cross-sectional study. Subjects: A total of 213 patients after stroke (>18 months post-onset), mean age 59 years (standard deviation (SD) 9.86 years), 56% men, mean time post-stroke 53 months (SD 37.8 months). Methods: Coping strategy was measured using the assimilative-accommodative coping scale, depression using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and quality of life using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF. Multivariable regression analyses were performed, adjusted for patient characteristics. Results: Depression score was independently related to all domains of quality of life (Psychological Health (B=-0.924; p=0.000), Physical Health (B=-0.832; p=0.000), Social Relationships (B=-0.917; p=0.000), Environment (B=-0.662, p=0.000)). Accommodative coping (B=0.305; p=0.024) and assimilative coping (B=0.235; p=0.070) were independently related to the domain Psychological Health, adjusted for depression and education level. Conclusion: Coping strategies and depression score were independently associated with Psychological Health in patients in the chronic phase after stroke. Patients who prefer an accommodative coping strategy may show less symptoms of depression. Preferable coping strategies may be trained in order to improve both depression score and health-related quality of life in future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available