4.5 Article

STROKE SURVIVORS', CAREGIVERS', AND HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS' PERSPECTIVES ON THE WEEKEND PASS TO FACILITATE TRANSITION HOME

Journal

JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
Volume 46, Issue 9, Pages 858-863

Publisher

FOUNDATION REHABILITATION INFORMATION
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1854

Keywords

stroke; rehabilitation; caregiver; transitions; health care professionals; health service delivery; qualitative

Funding

  1. Ontario Stroke Network Research Grant
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research New Investigator Award
  3. George, Margaret and Gary Hunt Family Chair in Geriatric Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To explore stroke survivors', caregivers', and health care professionals' perceptions of weekend passes offered during inpatient rehabilitation and its role in facilitating the transition home. Design: Qualitative descriptive. Subjects: Sixteen stroke survivors, 15 caregivers, and 20 health care professionals' from a rehabilitation hospital. Methods: Participants discussed their perceptions of the purpose of the weekend pass, experiences with the weekend pass including supports needed, and weekend pass administration. Focus group and interview data were audio recorded, professionally transcribed, checked for accuracy, and analyzed using conventional content analysis. Results: We identified 3 key themes: i) preparing for patients to be safe at home; gaining insight through the weekend pass; and the emotional context of the weekend pass. These themes varied by participant group. Conclusions: When offering weekend passes, stroke care systems should carefully consider patients' and caregivers' readiness, emotional state, and preparation for weekend passes. The weekend pass experience can inform in-patient therapy, provide patients and caregivers with insight into life after stroke, and help prepare patients and families for the ultimate transition home.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available