4.5 Article

SECONDARY HEALTH CONDITIONS IN PERSONS WITH SPINAL CORD INJURY: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY FROM ONE TO FIVE YEARS POST-DISCHARGE

Journal

JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
Volume 45, Issue 10, Pages 1016-1022

Publisher

FOUNDATION REHABILITATION INFORMATION
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1207

Keywords

spinal cord injury; secondary health conditions; risk factors; rehabilitation; longitudinal

Funding

  1. ZonMw Rehabilitation programme [14350003, 14350010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess the occurrence of secondary health conditions and their potential risk factors in persons with spinal cord injury from 1 to 5 years after discharge from initial inpatient rehabilitation. Design: Multicentre longitudinal study. Subjects: A total of 139 wheelchair-dependent persons with spinal cord injury. Methods: The occurrence of secondary health conditions and their potential risk factors were assessed in a clinical interview with a rehabilitation physician at 1 and 5 years after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation and by a telephone interview 2 years after discharge. Self-report questionnaires were used for the assessment of musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain. Results: Neuropathic pain (83.7-92.1%), musculoskeletal pain (62.3-87.1%) and urinary tract infection (56.5-58.9%) were the most frequently reported secondary health conditions. The occurrence of several secondary health conditions was higher among women and individuals with a complete lesion, tetraplegia, and with a higher body mass index. Conclusion: Secondary health conditions are common in the first years post-discharge following spinal cord injury, and their course seems to be relatively stable. These results emphasize the number of health issues that must be considered during post-injury care of persons with spinal cord injury living in the community, and the importance of a well-coordinated interdisciplinary approach from specialized rehabilitation centres.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available