4.5 Article

CONTINUITY OF REHABILITATION SERVICES IN POST-ACUTE CARE FROM THE AMBULATORY OUTPATIENTS' PERSPECTIVE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Journal

JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 58-64

Publisher

FOUNDATION REHABILITATION INFORMATION
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0638

Keywords

continuity of care; outpatient; rehabilitation care

Funding

  1. Carlos III Health Institute, Ministry of Health, Spain [PI060836]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To explore ambulatory outpatient experiences and perceptions in post-acute care settings and how these experiences may have led to perceived gaps in continuity of rehabilitation care. Subjects: Fifty-seven adults undergoing outpatient rehabilitation for musculoskeletal conditions/injuries, who had had more than 10 physiotherapy treatment sessions. Methods: Qualitative study using a modified grounded theory approach. Data collection was carried out through 9 focus groups. Each group was recorded, transcribed literally and analyzed thematically. Results: Participants described 3 main themes in continuity; relational, informational, and management continuity. Several factors that led to gaps in the 3 types of continuity were described. The relevant factors for relational continuity were: consistency of the multi-professional rehabilitation team; and an established provider patient relationship. Factors for informational continuity were: transfer of information among providers; and accumulated knowledge regarding patients' disability experiences. Factors for management continuity included: consistency of care among rehabilitation providers; flexibility of the team in adapting care to functional changes; and involvement of the team in achieving patient collaboration. Conclusion: This study provides evidence of gaps in different types of continuity of care within the post-acute rehabilitation services in ambulatory settings. Outpatients often perceive their experiences of rehabilitation care as non-connected or non-coherent over time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available