4.5 Article

MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES: A 10-YEAR FOLLOW-UP

Journal

JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages 323-329

Publisher

FOUNDATION REHABILITATION INFORMATION
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0666

Keywords

brain concussion; brain injuries; traumatic; post-concussion symptoms; quality of life; rehabilitation; intervention studies; RCT

Funding

  1. ForeningsSparbankens
  2. Sjuharad Foundation, Boras, Sweden
  3. Axel Linder Foundation, Alingsas, Sweden
  4. Selma Anderssons Foundation
  5. Uppsala University, Sweden

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective and design: Long-term consequences of mild traumatic brain injuries were investigated based on a 10-year follow-up of patients from a previously-published randomized controlled study of mild traumatic brain injuries. One aim was to describe changes over time after mild traumatic brain injuries in terms of the extent of persisting post-concussion symptoms, life satisfaction, perceived health, activities of daily living, changes in life roles and sick leave. Another aim was to identify differences between the intervention and control groups. Patients: The intervention group comprised 142 persons and the control group 56 persons. Methods: Postal questionnaires with a response rate of 56%. Results: No differences over time were found for the intervention and control groups in terms of post-concussion symptoms. In the intervention group some variables in life satisfaction, perceived health and daily life were decreased. Some roles had changed over the years for both groups. No other differences between the intervention and control groups were found. However, in both groups sick leave decreased. Conclusion: Early individual intervention by a qualified rehabilitation team does not appear to impact on the long-term outcome for persons with symptoms related to mild traumatic brain injuries. The status after approximately 3 weeks is indicative of the status after 10 years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available