4.3 Article

Surface Quality of Human Corneal Lenticules After SMILE Assessed Using Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy

Journal

JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 388-393

Publisher

SLACK INC
DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20140513-01

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To assess the cut quality of the anterior and posterior surfaces of intrastromal refractive lenticules removed during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: The VisuMax femtosecond laser (500 kHz; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) was used to perform SMILE on 8 eyes of 5 individuals to correct only myopia (no cylinder). The cut energy index was 26 (equivalent to an energy of 130 nJ) with a 2.5 x 2.5 mu m spot/track separation. The lenticule diameter was 6.5 mm with a minimum edge thickness of 15 mu m and the cap diameter was 7.3 mm with an intended thickness of 120 mu m. After laser treatment, the lenticule was loosened with a spatula and removed with forceps. The extracted lenticules were placed in 2% formalin and sent for imaging with an environmental scanning electron microscope. Images of the anterior and posterior surfaces of the lenticules were obtained at multiple magnifications (100x, 250x, and 500x). Surface quality was evaluated by an investigator who specializes in electron microscopy using three criteria: overall surface regularity, percent of surface irregularity, and position of irregular area. RESULTS: Both the anterior and posterior surfaces of the extracted lenticules were smooth and absent of surface irregularities. The cut edges also appeared uniform. Jagged edges were seen in several images, but were clearly caused by the forceps during extraction. CONCLUSIONS: Using the VisuMax laser to perform SMILE produces smooth cuts absent of surface irregularities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available