4.7 Article

Hierarchical porous carbon toward effective cathode in advanced zinc-cerium redox flow battery

Journal

JOURNAL OF RARE EARTHS
Volume 32, Issue 10, Pages 973-978

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S1002-0721(14)60171-X

Keywords

new energy; energy storage; redox flow battery; hierarchical porous carbon; cerium; carbon felt; electrode; electrolyte; rare earths

Funding

  1. National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) [2012CB215500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21361010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Advanced zinc-cerium redox flow battery (ZCRFB) is a large-scale energy storage system which plays a significant role in the application of new energy sources. The requirement of superior cathode with high acitivity and fast ion diffusion is a hierarchical porous structure, which was synthesized in this work by a method in which both hard template and soft template were used. The structure and the performance of the cathode prepared here were characterized and evaluated by a variety of techniques such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), cyclic voltammetry (CV), linear sweep voltammetry (LSV), and chronoamperometry (CA). There were mainly three types of pore size within the hierarchical porous carbon: 2 mu m, 80 nm, and 10 nm. The charge capacity of the cell using hierarchical porous carbon (HPC) as positive electrode was obviously larger than that using carbon felt; the former was 665.5 mAh with a coulombic efficiency of 89.0% and an energy efficiency of 79.0%, whereas the latter was 611.1 mAh with a coulombic efficiency of 81.5% and an energy efficiency of 68.6%. In addition, performance of the ZCRFB using HPC as positive electrode showed a good stability over 50 cycles. These results showed that the hierarchical porous carbon was superior over the carbon felt for application in ZCRFB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available