4.5 Article

Effects of electrolytes on the fabrication of three-dimensional nanoporous gold films by a rapid anodic potential step method for SERS

Journal

JOURNAL OF RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY
Volume 43, Issue 7, Pages 842-847

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jrs.3105

Keywords

SERS; nanoporous gold films; anodic potential step; electrolytes

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21173075, 20673103, 21003045]
  2. Ph. D. Programs Foundation of the Education Ministry of China [20104306110003]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China [Y4090658]
  4. Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Advanced Catalysis Materials & Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Reactive Chemistry on Solid Surfaces [DH201001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A unique one-step anodic potential step strategy has been developed recently by our group to fabricate a three-dimensional (3D) nanoporous gold film (NPGF) within 1 min as an efficient surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) active substrate. Gloria et al. (J. Electroanal. Chem. 2011, 656, 114119) demonstrated that the prepared NPGF under optimum conditions (2?M HCl, 50?s) has higher SERS intensities than that of a commercial single-use gold substrate. However, the SERS performance of 3D NPGFs fabricated in neutral KCl by this strategy have not been investigated. In this paper, SERS performances of the NPGFs fabricated in electrolytes of KCl and HCl are compared for the first time, using pyridine as a test molecule. Equivalent SERS intensities can be obtained on the 3D NPGFs prepared in these two electrolytes under respectively optimum conditions. The results suggest that hot spots of nanogaps and crevices because of the aggregation/coalescence of gold nanoparticles and the formation/removal of thin gold oxide coatings contribute greatly to the high SERS activity. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available