4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Adsorption of U(VI) from aqueous solution by sulfonated ordered mesoporous carbon

Journal

JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY
Volume 301, Issue 3, Pages 821-830

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-014-3237-4

Keywords

Ordered mesoporous carbon; Sulfonation; Uranium; Adsorption; Functionalization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21101024, 21201033, 21301028]
  2. National Undergraduate Training Programs for Innovation and Entrepreneurship [201210405006]
  3. Chinese Ministry of Education [211086]
  4. Young Scientists Training Program of Jiangxi Province [20122BCB23023]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20114BAB203002, 20122BAB203012, 20132BAB203027]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20110490857]
  7. Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education [GJJ13452]
  8. Open Project Foundation of Fundamental Science on Radioactive Geology and Exploration Technology Laboratory (East China Institute of Technology) [RGET1311]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The sulfonated mesoporous carbon (CMK-3-SO3H) prepared by functionalizing mesoporous carbon (CMK-3) via vapor transfer method has been explored for the removal and recovery of uranium from aqueous solutions. The influences of different experimental parameters such as solution pH, initial concentration, contact time and temperature on adsorption were investigated. The results showed that CMK-3-SO3H has the highest uranium sorption capacity at initial pH of 5.0 and contact time of 120 min, and the adsorption process could be better described by the pseudo-second-order model and Langmuir isotherm. Selective adsorption studies showed that the CMK-3-SO3H could selectively remove of U(VI), and the selectivity coefficients of mesoporous carbon in the presence of co-existing ions, Mg(II), Zn(II), Mn(II), Cu(II), Ni(II), Sr(II) and Hg(II) improved after functionalization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available