4.5 Article

Radiolabeling of low molecular weight-galactose-based glycodendrimer with technetium-99m and biodistribution studies

Journal

JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY
Volume 298, Issue 1, Pages 605-609

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-013-2502-2

Keywords

Glycodendrimer; D-Galactose; Radiolabeling; Technetium-99m; Biodistribution

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glycodendrimers are neoglycoconjugates that can be considered as bioisosters of glycoproteins, since they can mimic the multivalent interactions of lectin-carbohydrate. The ability of glycodendrimers to present multivalent interactions with lectins as compared to a monovalent ligand is referred to as cluster effect. It is expected that, because of the cluster effect, glycodendrimers would result in a better association with lectins than mono-carbohydrate anchored systems. Radioisotopes are useful to evaluate biodistribution of molecules. This study is important to obtain information about molecule-receptor interactions. Indeed, such study can provide an exquisite tool to evaluate the affinity of certain molecules to specific areas in the body, leading to the development of new radiopharmaceuticals and/or drug delivery systems. Herein, we describe a d-galactose coated low molecular weight PAMAM G0 dendrimer that was successfully radiolabeled with technetium-99m. Biodistribution studies and scintigraphic images were performed in healthy mice. It was observed high liver uptake which was significantly reduced in blocking studies, indicating hepatic specificity. Therefore, low molecular weight glycodendrimer can be considered as useful platform for selective targeting of drugs to the liver and to assess hepatic function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available