4.5 Article

Uranium isotopes in well water samples as drinking sources in some settlements around the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site, Kazakhstan

Journal

JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY
Volume 284, Issue 2, Pages 309-314

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-010-0463-2

Keywords

Semipalatinsk nuclear test site; Kazakhstan; Well waters; Uranium isotopes; Annual effective dose

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22404004] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Radiochemical results of U isotopes ((234)U, (235)U and (238)U) and their activity ratios are reported for well waters as local sources of drinking waters collected from the ten settlements around the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site (SNTS), Kazakhstan. The results show that (238)U varies widely from 3.6 to 356 mBq/L (0.3-28.7 mu g/L), with a factor of about 100. The (238)U concentrations in some water samples from Dolon, Tailan, Sarzhal and Karaul settlements are comparable to or higher than the World Health Organization's restrictive proposed guideline of 15 mu g (U)/L. The (234)U/(238)U activity ratios in the measured water samples are higher than 1, and vary between 1.1 and 7.9, being mostly from 1.5 to 3. The measured (235)U/(238)U activity ratios are around 0.046, indicating that U in these well waters is of natural origin. It is probable that the elevated concentration of (238)U found in some settlements around the SNTS is not due to the close-in fallout from nuclear explosions at the SNTS, but rather to the intensive weathering of rocks including U there. The calculated effective doses to adults resulting from consumption of the investigated waters are in the range 1.0-18.7 mu Sv/y. Those doses are lower than WHO and IAEA reference value (100 mu Sv/y) for drinking water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available