4.5 Article

Estimation of radiative effect of a heavy dust storm over northwest China using Fu-Liou model and ground measurements

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2012.10.018

Keywords

Dust aerosol; Radiative forcing; Fu-Liou model

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB955301]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [41175134]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1018]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [lzujbky-2011-145]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40975012]
  6. Foundation of Key Laboratory for Semi-Arid Climate Change of the Ministry of Education in Lanzhou University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A heavy dust storm that occurred in Northwestern China during April 24-30 2010 was studied using observational data along with the Fu-Liou radiative transfer model. The dust storm was originated from Mongolia and affected more than 10 provinces of China. Our results showed that dust aerosols have a significant impact on the radiative energy budget. At Minqin (102.959 degrees E, 38.607 degrees N) and Semi-Arid Climate and Environment Observatory of Lanzhou University (SACOL, 104.13 degrees E, 35.95 degrees N) sites, the net radiative forcing (RF) ranged from 5.93 to 35.7 W m(-2) at the top of the atmosphere (TOA), -63 to -30.94 W m(-2) at surface, and 16.77 to 5632 W m(-2) in the atmosphere. The maximum net radiative heating rate reached 5.89 K at 1.5 km on 24 April at the Minqin station and 4.46 K at 2.2 km on 29 April at the SACOL station. Our results also indicated that the radiative effect of dust aerosols is affected by aerosol optical depth (AOD), single-scattering albedo (SSA) and surface albedo. Modifications of the radiative energy budget by dust aerosols may have important implications for atmospheric circulation and regional climate. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available