4.5 Article

Emission spectroscopy from optically thick laboratory acetylene samples at high temperature

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2010.10.012

Keywords

Cool star atmosphere opacities; Hot acetylene (1000-1500 K); High resolution emission spectroscopy; Infrared; Radiative model

Funding

  1. CNRS-INSU
  2. Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (F.R.S.-FNRS) in Brussels
  3. Action de Recherches Concertees de la Communaute francaise de Belgique
  4. FRIA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, a high temperature source has been used to produce high temperature emission spectra of acetylene in the 3 pm spectral range, under Doppler limited resolution, and the complete spectral assignment has been performed using a global rovibrational Hamiltonian [Amyay B, Robert S, Herman M, Fayt A, Raghavendra B, Moudens A et al. Vibration-rotation pattern in acetylene (II): Introduction to Coriolis coupling in the global model and analysis of emission spectra of hot acetylene around 3 mu m. J Chem Phys 2009;131:114301]. The present investigation focuses on the relative emission line intensities which are observed to be affected. The strongest lines intensity may be considerably reduced for high column density acetylene samples, hence affecting the 3:1 ortho:para intensity ratio. A radiative model is developed to take into account the effects generated by the strong opacity of the acetylene samples including self-absorption and absorption of the radiation emitted by the hot environment. The model is used to extract the absolute concentration of the high temperature acetylene samples from the observed relative spectral intensities. The relevance of the procedure for infrared remote sensing in high temperature astrophysical environments, such as circumstellar envelopes of cool carbon rich evolved stars, is discussed. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available