4.1 Article

Qualitative methods to ensure acceptability of behavioral and social interventions to the target population

Journal

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages S69-S79

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00241.x

Keywords

acceptability; qualitative; behavioral

Funding

  1. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
  2. National Institutes of Health [NCI R01 CA138894-01A1, NIDDK R01 DK084331-01A1, R01 DK072994-05]
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [U48DP001917-01]
  4. American Cancer Society [RSGPB 113653]
  5. Peers for Progress Network [SOOOII24OIGEL]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: This paper introduces qualitative methods for assessing the acceptability of an intervention. Methods: Acceptability refers to determining how well an intervention will be received by the target population and the extent to which the new intervention or its components might meet the needs of the target population and organizational setting. In this paper, we focus on two common qualitative methods for conducting acceptability research and their advantages and disadvantages: focus groups and interviews. Results: We provide examples from our own research and other studies to demonstrate the use of these methods for conducting acceptability research and how one might adapt this approach for oral health research. Discussion: We present emerging methods for conducting acceptability research, including the use of community-based participatory research, as well as the utility of conducting acceptability research for assessing the appropriateness of measures in intervention research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available