4.6 Article

Association between early prenatal exposure to ambient air pollution and birth defects: evidence from newborns in Xi'an, China

Journal

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 494-501

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy137

Keywords

ambient air pollution; birth defects; NO2; PM10; SO2

Funding

  1. Project of birth defect control and prevention in Shaanxi [Sxwsjswzfcght2016-013]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81230016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The aim of this study was to investigate an association between birth defects and exposure to sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and particles <= 10 mu m in an aerodynamic diameter (PM10) during early pregnancy in Xi'an, China. Methods Birth defect data were from the Birth Defects Monitoring System of Xi'an, and data on ambient air pollutants during 2010-15 were from the Xi'an Environmental Protection Bureau. A generalized additive model (GAM) was used to investigate the relationship between birth defects and ambient air pollutants. Results Among the 8865 cases with birth defects analyzed, the overall incidence of birth defects was 117.33 per 10 000 infants. Ambient air pollutant exposure during the first trimester increased the risk of birth defects by 10.3% per 10 mu g/m(3) increment of NO2 and 3.4% per 10 mu g/m(3) increment of PM10. No significant association was found between birth defects and SO2. Moreover, NO2 increased risk of neural tube defects, congenital heart disease, congenital polydactyly, cleft palate, digestive system abnormalities and gastroschisis, and PM10 was associated with congenital heart disease and cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Conclusions Chinese women should avoid exposure to high levels of NO2 and PM10 during the first 3 months of pregnancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available