4.6 Article

The effect of a vaccination program on child anthropometry: evidence from India's Universal Immunization Program

Journal

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 489-497

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fds032

Keywords

anthropometry; childhood vaccination; India; undernutrition; Universal Immunization Program

Funding

  1. United States Department of Agriculture's Public Service Leaders Scholarship
  2. David E. Bell Postdoctoral Fellowship Program at the Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Childhood vaccination may protect childrens nutritional status and lead to improved child growth in developing countries. This study evaluates the effect of Indias childhood vaccination program Universal Immunization Program (UIP) on the growth of children 4 years of age. Methods Regression models were estimated to examine the effect of UIP on vaccination status and childrens anthropometric outcomes, as well as to test whether UIPs effect was uniform across various subpopulations of Indian children. Results UIP increased height-for-age and weight-for-age among children. This effect constituted a 22-25 reduction in the height-for-age deficit and a 15 reduction in the weight-for-age deficit of the average child. The program appears to have had no effect on other anthropometric indicators or vaccination status. UIP also led to differential changes in anthropometry and vaccination status, based on differences in wealth, maternal education and scheduled-caste status. Conclusions UIP led to improved child growth. This suggests that vaccination programsin addition to being a major intervention for reducing child mortalitymight be considered a tool for mitigating undernutrition in developing countries. This study also adds to the growing evidence that childhood vaccination programs are high-return investments because they produce long-term health benefits for children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available