4.5 Article

Alcohol problems and all-cause mortality in men and women: Predictive capacity of a clinical screening tool in a 21-year follow-up of a large, UK-wide, general population-based survey

Journal

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages 317-321

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.09.021

Keywords

Alcohol problems; All-cause mortality; Predictive capacity

Categories

Funding

  1. UK MRC
  2. Scottish Government Health Directorates
  3. UK Biotechnology and Biological Research Council
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  5. Economic and Social Research Council
  6. University of Edinburgh
  7. Wellcome Trust [U.1300.00.006.00012.01]
  8. UK Medical Research Council [U.1300.00.004]
  9. MRC [MC_U130059821, MC_U130059811] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Medical Research Council [MC_U130059821, MC_U130059811, U1475000002] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: While the relation between alcohol consumption and mortality has been well explored, little is known about the link between alcohol problems and mortality in general population-based studies, particularly among women. This was the objective of the present study Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 5333 non-abstaining individuals (2539 women) from the UK-wide Health and Lifestyle Survey (aged 42.9 years at study induction) completed the CAGE questionnaire of alcohol problems and participated in a medical examination in 1984/1985; they were then followed up for mortality experience until 2005. Results: Alcohol problems at baseline were less common in women (2.4%) than in men (7.8%). A total of 21 years of follow-up gave rise to 1201 deaths. Elevated rates of mortality were evident in persons reporting symptoms of alcohol problems in comparison to those who did not. In gender-stratified analyses, alcohol problems were more strongly associated with mortality risk in women (age-adjusted hazards ratio: 2.25; 95% confidence interval: 1.22-4.12) than in men (1.49; 1.12-1.99), although this effect modification was not statistically significant (P value for interaction=0.125). Controlling for a range of covariates-including socioeconomic position, co-morbidity (somatic and psychiatric), and alcohol intake-had essentially no impact on these associations. Conclusion: The CAGE questionnaire may have some utility in routine health assessments in the general population. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available