4.3 Article

Pharmacological treatment strategies in obsessive compulsive disorder: A cross-sectional view in nine international OCD centers

Journal

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 596-602

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0269881113517955

Keywords

Obsessive-compulsive disorder; treatment; medication; augmentation; international; effectiveness

Funding

  1. Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  2. Forest Laboratories
  3. Janssen-Ortho Inc.
  4. National Institutes of Health
  5. Pfizer Inc.
  6. Servier
  7. Wyeth-Ayerst
  8. Astra Zeneca
  9. Biovail
  10. Eli Lilly
  11. Labo Pharm
  12. Lundbeck
  13. Shire
  14. International College of Obsessive Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  15. UKMRC
  16. European College of Neuropsychopharmacology
  17. Intermational College of Behavioural Addiction
  18. Transcept
  19. Roche
  20. Forest
  21. IP-oxytocin
  22. Otsuka
  23. Pfizer
  24. Pferin
  25. Abbott
  26. Astrazeneca
  27. GlaxoSmithKline
  28. Jazz Pharmaceuticals
  29. Johnson Johnson
  30. Orion
  31. Pharmacia
  32. Solvay
  33. Sumitomo
  34. Takeda
  35. Tikvah
  36. Wyeth
  37. National Institute of Mental Health
  38. Department of Defense

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: It is unknown what next-step strategies are being used in clinical practice for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) who do not respond to first-line treatment. As part of a cross-sectional study of OCD, treatment and symptom information was collected. Method: Consecutive OCD out-patients in nine international centers were evaluated by self-report measures and clinical/ structured interviews. OCD symptom severity was evaluated by the Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S). Clinical response to current treatment was evaluated by the CGI-Improvement Scale (CGI-I <= 2). Results: In total, 361 participants reported taking medication; 77.6% were taking a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; 50% reported use of at least one augmentation strategy. Antipsychotics were most often prescribed as augmenters (30.3%), followed by benzodiazepines (24.9%) and antidepressants (21.9%). No differences in OCD symptom severity were found between patients taking different classes of augmentation agents. Conclusions: Results from this international cross-sectional study indicate that current OCD treatment is in line with evidence-based treatment guidelines. Although augmentation strategies are widely used, no significant differences in OCD symptom severity were found between monotherapy and augmentation or between different therapeutic agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available