4.3 Article

Spatial and sustained attention in relation to smoking status: behavioural performance and brain activation patterns

Journal

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages 1485-1495

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0269881110391830

Keywords

Attentional networks; attentional reorienting; fMRI; nicotine; smoking; sustained attention

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) [Wi1316/7-1]
  2. Johnson and Johnson/Janssen Pharmaceutica
  3. Janssen Cilag
  4. Pfizer Inc.
  5. AstraZenca

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nicotine enhances attentional functions. Since chronic nicotine exposure through smoking induces neuroadaptive changes in the brain at a structural and molecular level, the present functional MRI (fMRI) study aimed at investigating the neural mechanisms underlying visuospatial and sustained attention in smokers and non-smokers. Visuospatial attention was assessed with a location-cueing paradigm, while sustained attention was measured by changes in response speed over time. During invalid trials, neural activity within the basal forebrain was selectively enhanced in smokers and higher basal forebrain activity was associated with increased parietal cortex activation. Moreover, higher levels of expired carbon monoxide in smokers before scanning were associated with higher parietal cortex activation and faster responses to invalidly cued targets. Smokers showed a slowing of responses and additionally recruited an area within the right supramarginal gyrus with increasing time on task. Activity decreases over time were observed in visual areas in smokers. The data provide evidence for altered attentional functions in smokers as compared with non-smokers, which were partly modulated by residual nicotine levels and were observed at a behavioural level for sustained and at a neural level for spatial and sustained attention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available