4.5 Article

Differentiating ischemic from hemorrhagic stroke using plasma biomarkers: The S100B/RAGE pathway

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS
Volume 75, Issue 15, Pages 4758-4765

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.01.033

Keywords

Stroke; Ischemic; Hemorrhagic; S100B; sRAGE

Funding

  1. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias [FIS 08/361, 11/176]
  2. Carlos III Health Institute [FI09/00017, CP09/00136, CP09/00265]
  3. Biosite Inc.
  4. Neurovascular Research Laboratory (RENEVAS) [RD06/0026/0010]
  5. European Stroke Network (EUSTROKE) [7FP Health F2-08-202213]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although neuroimaging is useful in differentiating ischemic (IS) from hemorrhagic (ICH) stroke in the Emergency Department, a wide-available rapid biochemical test would add advantages in the pre-hospital triage and management of stroke patients. Our aim was to examine the predictive value of a panel of blood-borne biomarkers to differentiate IS from ICH. Admission blood samples obtained within 24 h from stroke symptoms onset were tested by ELISA for CRP, D-dimer, sRAGE, MMP9, S100B, BNP, NT-3, caspase-3, chimerin-II, secretagogin, cerebellin and NPY. The complete protocol was achieved in 915 patients (776 IS, 139 ICH). Among blood samples obtained <6 h from symptoms onset (n=337), S100B levels were increased in ICH (107.58 vs 58.70 pg/mL; p<0.001) whereas sRAGE levels were decreased (0.77 vs 1.02 ng/mL; p=0.009) as compared to IS. In this subset of patients S100B (OR 3.97 95% CI 1.82-8.68; p=0.001) and sRAGE (OR 0.22 95% CI 0.10-0.52; p<0.001) were independently associated with ICH. A regression tree was created by CART method showing good classification ability (AUC=0.762). Similar results were found for samples obtained within 3 h. In conclusion, a combination of biomarkers including those of the S100B/RAGE pathway seems promising to achieve a rapid biochemical diagnosis of IS versus ICH in the first hours from symptoms onset. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Translational Proteomics. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available