4.5 Article

A quantitative proteomic workflow for characterization of frozen clinical biopsies: Laser capture microdissection coupled with label-free mass spectrometry

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS
Volume 77, Issue -, Pages 433-440

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.09.019

Keywords

Laser capture microdissection; Proteomics; Label-free; Biopsy; Mass spectrometry

Funding

  1. Ohio State University
  2. National Institutes of Health [RR025755, DK074661, DK076566, GM 077185, GM 069589]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes a simple, highly efficient and robust proteomic workflow for routine liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry analysis of Laser Microdissection Pressure Catapulting (LMPC) isolates. Highly efficient protein recovery was achieved by optimization of a one-pot protein extraction and digestion allowing for reproducible proteomic analysis on as few as 500 LMPC isolated cells. The method was combined with label-free spectral count quantitation to characterize proteomic differences from 3000-10,000 LMPC isolated cells. Significance analysis of spectral count data was accomplished using the edgeR tag-count R package combined with hierarchical cluster analysis. To illustrate the capability of this robust workflow, two examples are presented: 1) analysis of keratinocytes from human punch biopsies of normal skin and a chronic diabetic wound and 2) comparison of glomeruli from needle biopsies of patients with kidney disease. Differentially expressed proteins were validated by use of immunohistochemistry. These examples illustrate that tissue proteomics carried out on limited clinical material can obtain informative proteomic signatures for disease pathogenesis and demonstrate the suitability of this approach for biomarker discovery. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available