4.5 Article

Hexapeptide library as a universal tool for sample preparation in protein glycosylation analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS
Volume 75, Issue 5, Pages 1515-1528

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.11.028

Keywords

On-bead glycan release; Glycan analysis; Protein enrichment and depletion; Protein capturing; ProteoMiner beads; DNA sequencer

Funding

  1. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  2. Helmholtz Initiative and Networking Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent analytical advancements allow for large-scale glycomics and glycan-biomarker research with N-glycans released from complex protein mixtures of e.g. plasma with a wide range of protein concentrations. Protein enrichment techniques to obtain samples with a better representation of low-abundance proteins are hardy applied. In this study, hexapeptide ligands previously described for enrichment of low-abundance proteins in proteomics are evaluated for glycan analysis. A repeatable on-bead glycan release strategy was developed, and glycans were analyzed using capillary sieving electrophoresis on a DNA analyzer. Binding of proteins to the hexapeptide library occurred via the protein backbone. At neutral pH no discrimination between protein glycoforms was observed. Interestingly, glycan profiles of plasma with and without hexapeptide library enrichment revealed very similar patterns, despite the vast changes in protein concentrations in the samples. The most significant differences in glycosylation profiles were ascribed to a reduction in immunoglobulin-derived glycans. These results suggest that specific and sensitive biomarkers will be hard to access on the full plasma level using protein enrichment in combination with glycan analysis. Instead, fractionation techniques or profiling strategies on the glycopeptide level after enrichment are proposed for in-depth glycoproteomics research. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available