4.5 Article

Diffprot - software for non-parametric statistical analysis of differential proteomics data

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS
Volume 75, Issue 13, Pages 4062-4073

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.05.030

Keywords

Mass spectrometry; Statistics; Proteomics; Quantification; Resampling

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [R130103, N301 2543 33]
  2. European Union in the framework of European Social Fund through the Warsaw University of Technology Development Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mass spectrometry-based global proteomics experiments generate large sets of data that can be converted into useful information only with an appropriate statistical approach. We present Diffprot - a software tool for statistical analysis of MS-derived quantitative data. With implemented resampling-based statistical test and local variance estimate, Diffprot allows to draw significant results from small scale experiments and effectively eliminates false positive results. To demonstrate the advantages of this software, we performed two spike-in tests with complex biological matrices, one label-free and one based on iTRAQ quantification; in addition, we performed an iTRAQ experiment on bacterial samples. In the spike-in tests, protein ratios were estimated and were in good agreement with theoretical values; statistical significance was assigned to spiked proteins and single or no false positive results were obtained with Diffprot. We compared the performance of Diffprot with other statistical tests - widely used t-test and non-parametric Wilcoxon test. In contrast to Diffprot, both generated many false positive hits in the spike-in experiment. This proved the superiority of the resampling-based method in terms of specificity, making Diffprot a rational choice for small scale high-throughput experiments, when the need to control the false positive rate is particularly pressing. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available