4.5 Article

Proteomic analysis of early response lymph node proteins in mice treated with titanium dioxide nanoparticles

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS
Volume 74, Issue 12, Pages 2745-2759

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.08.009

Keywords

Proteomics; Mass spectrometry; TiO2 nanoparticle; Mouse lymph node; O-16/O-18 labeling; LC-MS/MS

Funding

  1. National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (NCTR/FDA)
  2. FDA [FDA 224-07-0007]
  3. NIEHS [NIH Y1ES1027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human exposure to nanoparticles is inevitable from natural and anthropogenic sources. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles are increasingly being used in pharmaceutical and cosmetic products. Previous studies revealed that TiO2 levels were significantly increased in tissues (e.g., lymph nodes) after mice were injected with nanosized TiO2. To identify early response lymph node proteins to TiO2 nanoparticles, groups of mice were intradermally injected with a low dose of DeGussa P25 TiO2 nanoparticles or vehicle alone. The proteomes of lymph nodes at 24 h were quantitatively analyzed using trypsin-catalyzed O-16/O-18 labeling in conjunction with two-dimensional liquid chromatography separation and tandem mass spectrometry (2DLC-MS/MS). A total of 33 proteins were significantly changed (over 1.3-fold, p < 0.05) in the mice treated with TiO2 nanoparticles, which accounted for approximately 1% of the total proteins identified. The differentially expressed proteins mainly involve the immune response (e.g., inflammation), lipid and fatty acid metabolism, mRNA processing, and nucleosome assembly. Regulation of functionally distinct classes of proteins could be mediated by estrogen receptor (ESR1), PPAR-gamma, and c-Myc signalings, etc. The differentially expressed proteins identified in this experiment could represent early response proteins to TiO2 nanoparticle treatment in mouse lymph nodes. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available