4.5 Review

Thiol redox proteomics seen with fluorescent eyes: The detection of cysteine oxidative modifications by fluorescence derivatization and 2-DE

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS
Volume 75, Issue 2, Pages 329-338

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.09.013

Keywords

Post-translational modifications; Cysteine oxidation; Thiol redox proteomics; Redox DIGE; Redox fluorescence switch (RFS); 2-DE

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN) [CSD2007-00020, CP07/00143, PS09/00101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is increasing evidence that several reversible oxidative post-translational modifications of protein cysteines participate in cell signalling. Specific proteomic techniques are required to identify these modifications and to study their regulation in different cell processes, that are collectively known as thiol redox proteomics. Recently, fluorescence derivatization methods have been developed that enable these post-translational modifications to be studied using proteomic workflows based on two-dimensional electrophoresis, which is a relatively accessible and affordable technique. As well as enabling a large number of samples to be processed, two-dimensional electrophoresis has the advantage that it does not rely on the intensive use of mass spectrometers. This methodology allows to visualise redox changes in a broad context and, although identification of the modified residues is not so straightforward, complementary derivatization can overcome this drawback. Here we review the different derivatization strategies that have been employed in these studies, comparing their advantages and potential limitations. We also review the applications and results obtained, with particular emphasis on those involving (patho)physiological stimuli, thereby showing the potential of these techniques to study the thiol redox proteome. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available