4.5 Article

Proteomic analysis reveals late exercise effects on cardiac remodeling following myocardial infarction

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS
Volume 73, Issue 10, Pages 2041-2049

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.06.009

Keywords

Myocardial infarction; Exercise; Proteomics; Anti-oxidant; Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis; Left ventricular remodeling

Funding

  1. NIH [HL074273, HL75360]
  2. American Heart Association [AHA 0855119F]
  3. Max and Minnie Tomerlin Voelcker Fund
  4. UTHSCSA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exercise has been shown to improve function of the left ventricle (LV) following myocardial infarction (MI). The mechanisms to explain this benefit have not been fully delineated, but may involve improved mechanics resulting in unloading effects and increased endothelial nitric oxide synthase levels [1,2]. Accordingly, the goal of this study was to determine how the LV infarct proteome is altered by a post-MI exercise regimen. Sprague-Dawley rats underwent ligation of the left descending coronary artery to induce MI. Exercise training was initiated four weeks post-MI and continued for 8 weeks in n=12 rats. Compared with the sedentary MI group (n=10), the infarct region of rats receiving exercise showed 20 protein spots with altered intensities in two-dimensional gels (15 increased and 5 decreased; p<0.05). Of 52 proteins identified in 20 spots, decreased levels of voltage-dependent anion-selective channel 2 and increased levels of glutathione perioxidase and manganese superoxide were confirmed by immunoblotting. Cardiac function was preserved in rats receiving exercise training, and the beneficial effect was linked with changes in these 3 proteins. In conclusion, our results suggest that post-MI exercise training increases antioxidant levels and decreases ion channel levels, which may explain, in part, the improved cardiac function seen with exercise. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available