4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Controversies in fat perception

Journal

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages 479-493

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.08.033

Keywords

Fat taste; Sensory fat perception; Neuronal fat perception; Neuroimaging; Free fatty acids; Obesity

Funding

  1. Kompetenznetz Adipositas (Competence Network for Adiposity) - German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [FKZ: 01GI1122F]
  2. Center for Nutritional Medicine (ZEM) Tuebingen-Hohenheim Minigraduiertenprogramm [E11000171]
  3. Else-Kroner-Fresenius-Stiftung [2015_A28]
  4. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through the Initiative and Network Fund of the Helmholtz Association [01GI0925]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nutritional fat is one of the most controversial topics in nutritional research, particularly against the background of obesity. Studies investigating fat taste perception have revealed several associations with sensory, genetic, and personal factors (e.g. BMI). However, neuronal activation patterns, which are known to be highly sensitive to different tastes as well as to BMI differences, have not yet been included in the scheme of fat taste perception. We will therefore provide a comprehensive survey of the sensory, genetic, and personal factors associated with fat taste perception and highlight the benefits of applying neuroimaging research. We will also give a critical overview of studies investigating sensory fat perception and the challenges resulting from multifaceted methodological approaches. In conclusion, we will discuss a multifactorial approach to fat perception to gain a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms that cause varying fat sensitivity which could be responsible for overeating. Such knowledge might be beneficial in new treatment strategies for obesity and overweight (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available