4.7 Article

Proteomic Analysis of Human Fetal Atria and Ventricle

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 5869-5878

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr5007685

Keywords

Bioinformatics; chamber specificity; fetal tissue; mass spectrometry; ventricle; Q-exactive

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-106538, GPG-102166]
  2. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario [T-6281, NS-6636]
  3. Ontario Research Fund Global Leadership Round in Genomics and Life Sciences [GL2-01012]
  4. Canada Research Chair in Cardiovascular Proteomics and Molecular Therapeutic
  5. Ontario Graduate Scholarship in Science and Technology
  6. Department of Medical Biophysics Excellence Award
  7. Kristi Piia CALLUM Memorial Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study we carried out a mass spectrometry-based proteome analysis of human fetal atria and ventricles. Heart protein lysates were analyzed on the Q-Exactive mass spectrometer in biological triplicates. Protein identification using MaxQuant yielded a total of 2754 atrial protein groups (91%) and 2825 ventricular protein groups (83%) in at least 2 of the 3 runs with >= 2 unique peptides. Statistical analyses using fold-enrichment (>2) and p-values (<= 0.05) selected chamber-enriched atrial (134) and ventricular (81) protein groups. Several previously characterized cardiac chamber-enriched proteins were identified in this study including atrial isoform of myosin light chain 2 (MYL7), atrial natriuretic peptide (NPPA), connexin 40 (GJA5), and peptidylglycine alpha-amidating monooxygenase (PAM) for atria, and ventricular isoforms of myosin light chains (MYL2 and MYL3), myosin heavy chain 7 (MYH7), and connexin 43 (GJA1) for ventricle. Our data was compared to in-house generated and publicly available human microarrays, several human cardiac proteomes, and phenotype ontology databases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available