4.7 Article

Universal and Confident Phosphorylation Site Localization Using phosphoRS

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages 5354-5362

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr200611n

Keywords

mass spectrometry; protein phosphorylation; phosphopeptides; tandem mass spectrometry; identification; localization

Funding

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim
  2. Austrian Proteomics Platform (APP)
  3. European Commission
  4. Austrian Science Fund via the Special Research Program Chromosome Dynamics [SFB-F3402]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An algorithm for the assignment of phosphorylalion sites in peptides is described. The program uses tandem mass spectrometry data in conjunction with the respective peptide sequences to calculate site probabilities for all potential phosphorylation sites. Tandem mass spectra from synthetic phosphopeptides were used for optimization of the scoring parameters employing all commonly used fragmentation techniques. Calculation of probabilities was adapted to the different fragmentation methods and to the maximum mass deviation of the analysis. The software includes a novel approach to peak extraction, required for matching experimental data to the theoretical values of all isoforms, by defining individual peak depths for the different regions of the tandem mass spectrum. Mixtures of synthetic phosphopeptides were used to validate the program by calculation of its false localization rate versus site probability cutoff characteristic. Notably, the empirical obtained precision was higher than indicated by the applied probability cutoff In addition, the performance of the algorithm was compared to existing approaches to site localization such as Ascore. In order to assess the practical applicability of the algorithm to large data sets, phosphopeptides from a biological sample were analyzed, localizing more than 3000 nonredundant phosphorylation sites. Finally, the results obtained for the different fragmentation methods and localization tools were compared and discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available