4.7 Article

Comparison of Three Quantitative Phosphoproteomic Strategies to Study Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Signaling

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages 5454-5462

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr200697x

Keywords

phosphoproteomic; RTK; titanium dioxide; EphB; quantitation; phosphorylation; phosphopeptide; SILAC; mass spectrometry; proteomics

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P30 NS050276, S10 RR 017990-01]
  2. NCI [2P30 CA 016087]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are three quantitative phosphoproteomic strategies most commonly used to study receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling. These strategies quantify changes in: (1) all three forms of phosphosites (phosphoserine, phosphothreonine and phosphotyrosine) following enrichment of phosphopeptides by titanium dioxide or immobilized metal affinity chromatography; (2) phosphotyrosine sites following anti- phosphotyrosine antibody enrichment of phosphotyrosine peptides; or (3) phosphotyrosine proteins and their binding partners following anti-phosphotyrosine protein immunoprecipitation. However, it is not clear from literature which strategy is more effective. In this study, we assessed the utility of these three phosphoproteomic strategies in RTK signaling studies by using EphB receptor signaling as an example. We used all three strategies with stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) to compare changes in phosphoproteomes upon EphB receptor activation. We used bioinformatic analysis to compare results from the three analyses. Our results show that the three strategies provide complementary information about RTK pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available