4.7 Article

Quantitative Analysis of the Intra- and Inter-Individual Variability of the Normal Urinary Proteome

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 637-645

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr100835s

Keywords

Urinary proteome; label-free quantification; technical and biological variation; absolute quantitation

Funding

  1. PROSPECTS
  2. European Directorate [HEALTH-F4-2008-201648/PROSPECTS]
  3. Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urine is a readily and noninvasively obtainable body fluid. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics has shown that urine contains thousands of proteins. Urine is a potential source of biomarkers for diseases of proximal and distal tissues but it is thought to be more variable than the more commonly used plasma. By LC-MS/MS analysis on an LTQ-Orbitrap without prefractionation we characterized the urinary proteome of seven normal human donors over three consecutive days. Label-free quantification of triplicate single runs covered the urinary proteome to a depth of more than 600 proteins. The median coefficient of variation (cv) of technical replicates was 0.18. Interday variability was markedly higher with a cv of 0.48 and the overall variation of the urinary proteome between individuals was 0.66. Thus technical variability in our data was 7.5%, whereas intrapersonal variability contributed 45.5% and interpersonal variability contributed 47.1% to total variability. Determination of the normal fluctuation of individual urinary proteins should be useful in establishing significance thresholds in biomarker studies. Our data also allowed definition of a common and abundant set of 500 proteins that were readily detectable in all studied individuals. This core urinary proteome has a high proportion of secreted, membrane, and relatively high-molecular weight proteins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available