4.7 Article

Time-Course Changes in Potential Biomarkers Detected Using a Metabonomic Approach in Walker 256 Tumor-Bearing Rats

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 1953-1961

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr101198q

Keywords

metabonomics; time-course analysis; Walker 256 tumor; biomarkers; reversed-phase liquid chromatography; hydrophilic interaction chromatography

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30873195]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A metabonomic approach based on complementary hydrophilic interaction chromatography and reversed-phase liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry and time-course analysis of metabolites was implemented to find more reliable potential biomarkers in urine of Walker 256 tumor-bearing rats. A major challenge in metabonomics is distinguishing reliable biomarkers that are closely associated with the genesis and progression of diseases from those that are unrelated but altered significantly. In this study, these biomarkers were selected according to the change trends of discriminating metabolites during the genesis and progression of cancer. Seven consecutive batches of urine samples from preinoculation to 16 days after were collected and analyzed. Multivariate analysis revealed 87 discriminating metabolites. Time-course analysis of discriminating metabolites was used to select more reliable biomarkers with regular and reasonable change trends. Finally, 47 were found and 15 were identified including 12 carnitine derivatives, 2 amino acid derivatives, 1 nucleoside. On the basis of time-course behaviors of these potential biomarkers, we hypothesize such disruption might result from elevated cell proliferation, reduced beta-oxidation of fatty acids, and poor renal tubular reabsorption. These studies demonstrate that this method can help to find more reliable potential biomarkers and provide valuable biochemical insights into metabolic alterations in tumor-bearing biosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available