4.7 Article

Undesirable Charge-Enhancement of Isobaric Tagged Phosphopeptides Leads to Reduced Identification Efficiency

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages 4045-4052

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr100230q

Keywords

Mass spectrometry; Quantitation; Phosphorylation; Isobaric tags; iTRAQ; TMT

Funding

  1. Lundbeck Foundation
  2. Danish Natural Science Research Council [MRL09-06-5989, FK272-08-0044]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study of cellular dynamics by proteomics using mass spectrometry requires a quantitation strategy that is robust, sensitive, and of sufficient resolution to deal with subtle changes in protein expression or post-translational modification. The major quantitation strategies are stable isotopic labeling of proteins and peptides for in vitro cell culture systems (stable isotope labeling using amino acids in cell culture, SILAC) or isobaric peptide labels such as isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) and tandem mass tags (TMT) for both in vitro and in vivo systems. These quantitation strategies have also been successfully applied to phosphoproteomics studies for the investigation of signal transduction pathways. Here we describe major drawbacks associated with isobaric labeling for the identification and quantitation of phosphopeptides using electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Phosphopeptide derivatization with isobaric tags results in significantly greater charging in electrospray ionization. This reduces phosphopeptide identification efficiency with multistage activation and HCD MS/MS by more than 50% and may contribute to the discrepancy observed between identifications observed for large cell- or tissue-based data sets from labeled and nonlabeled peptide mixtures. Ammonia vapor sprayed perpendicular to the electrospray needle during ionization resulted in an overall decrease in the average charge states and a concomitant increase in phosphopeptide identifications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available