4.5 Article

Agonistic sounds signal male quality in the Lusitanian toadfish

Journal

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 149, Issue -, Pages 192-198

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.06.002

Keywords

Acoustic communication; Fish; Temporal cues; Spectral cues; Steroid hormones; Territorial defence

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Foundation, Portugal [PTDC/MAR/118767/2010, UID 331/94, UID 329, SFRH/BPD/41489/2007]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/MAR/118767/2010] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acoustic communication during agonistic behaviour is widespread in fishes. Yet, compared to other taxa, little is known on the information content of fish agonistic calls and their effect on territorial defence. Lusitanian toadfish males (Halobatrachus didactylus) are highly territorial during the breeding season and use sounds (boatwhistles, BW) to defend nests from intruders. BW present most energy in either the fundamental frequency, set by the contraction rate of the sonic muscles attached to the swimbladder, or in the harmonics, which are multiples of the fundamental frequency. Here we investigated if temporal and spectral features of BW produced during territorial defence reflect aspects of male quality that may be important in resolving disputes. We found that higher mean pulse period (i.e. lower fundamental frequency) reflected higher levels of 11-ketotestosterone (11KT), the main teleost androgen which, in turn, was significantly related with male condition (relative body mass and glycogen content). BW dominant harmonic mean and variability decreased with sonic muscle lipid content. We found no association between BW duration and male quality. Taken together, these results suggest that the spectral content of fish agonistic sounds may signal male features that are key in fight outcome. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available