4.7 Article

Peroxisomes from the Heavy Mitochondrial Fraction: Isolation by Zonal Free Flow Electrophoresis and Quantitative Mass Spectrometrical Characterization

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 113-124

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr9004663

Keywords

Organelle proteomics; peroxisomes; D-amino acid oxidase; ABCD3; free flow electrophoresis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peroxisomes are a heterogeneous group of organelles fulfilling reactions in a variety of metabolic pathways. To investigate if functionally different subpopulations can be found within a single tissue, peroxisomes from the heavy mitochondrial fraction (HM-Po) of the rat liver were isolated and compared to classic peroxisomes from the light mitochondrial fraction (LM-Po) using iTRAQ tandem mass spectrometry. Peroxisomes represent only a minor although significant proportion of the heavy mitochondrial fraction (2700g(max)) precluding a straightforward isolation by standard protocols. Thus, a new fractionation scheme suitable for a subsequent mass spectrometrical analysis was developed using a combination of centrifugation techniques and zonal free flow electrophoresis. On the basis of the iTRAQ-measurement, a variation of the peroxisomal protein pattern between both fractions could be determined and further confirmed by immunoblotting and enzyme activity assays for selected proteins: whereas peroxisomes from the light mitochondrial fraction contain high amounts of beta-oxidation enzymes, peroxisomes from the heavy mitochondrial fraction were dominated by enzymes fulfilling other functions. Among other findings, HM-Po was characterized by a high abundance of D-amino acid oxidase. This observation can be mirrored at the ultrastructural level, where tissue sections of liver peroxisomes show a heterogeneous staining for the enzymes activity, when visualized by the cerium technique.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available