4.7 Article

Targeted Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Identification of Differentially Expressed Proteins between Bax-Expressing and Deficient Colorectal Carcinoma Cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages 3403-3414

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr9000477

Keywords

quantitative proteome analysis; proteomics; TRAIL; apoptosis; Bax

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Of Canada
  2. Canada Research Chairs program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bax, a Bcl-2 interacting protein, plays a central role in several stimuli-induced apoptosis pathways through its functional and physical interactions with various biologically important proteins. Identification of the Bax-modulating protein network should be useful to further our understanding of Bax-mediated apoptosis. For the first time, we performed proteome-wide quantification and identification of differentially expressed proteins between Bax(+/-) and Bax(-/-) HCT116 clones using a newly developed quantitative mass spectrometric analysis strategy. This strategy is based on forward and reverse differential isotope labeling of the proteome digests of two comparative cells, followed by two-dimensional liquid chromatography separation and automated peptide deposition to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization sample plates for MS quantification and MS/MS peptide sequence identification. We quantified and identified 200 differentially expressed proteins involved in various cellular processes. Through bioinformatic analysis, four groups of differentially expressed proteins were highlighted for the association with Bax: mitochondria permeability transition channel proteins, Bax regulator proteins, heat shock protein family members, and oxidative stress-triggered proteins. These results indicate the functional diversity of Bax and provide new research directions to study the biology of Bax-regulated apoptosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available