4.2 Article

Equivalent CTOD Ratio β for Engineering Assessment of CTOD Correction for Constraint Loss

Publisher

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4006346

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The critical CTOD delta(WP) for structural components associated with plastic constraint loss in case of the brittle fracture over small-scale yielding condition can be corrected from CTOD fracture toughness delta by means of the equivalent CTOD ratio beta defined as delta/delta(WP), which is based on the Weibull stress criterion. In this study, taking the case of specific wide plate components subjected to uni-axial tensile load, the effect on beta is analyzed taking account of Weibull shape parameter m, loading level, constraint effect that can be influenced by material work-hardening and crack type/size in structural components, etc., and volumetric effect. It is found that the beta-value is almost constant beyond the applied CTOD level that is lower than CTOD of small-scale yielding limit (SSY-limit) for 25 mm thick toughness specimen. From an engineering point of view, the beta-value at the CTOD level of 0.01 mm is used in the whole loading range beyond SSY-limit CTOD, which provides to some extent conservative measure of fracture toughness of structural components. The defined beta is found to decrease with increasing Weibull shape parameter m and yield-to-tensile ratio YR of steel for all type of wide plates concerned. The crack length effect on beta is quasi-theoretically formulated, which can convert the beta for the wide plate with reference crack size to beta for target crack size. These beta and quasi-theoretical equations for the correction of crack size effect can be utilized for estimating the CTOD for wide plate in consideration of constraint loss effect without numerical calculation of the Weibull stress. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4006346]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available