4.8 Article

Sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)/mesoporous silica hybrid membrane for high performance vanadium redox flow battery

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 257, Issue -, Pages 221-229

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.127

Keywords

Vanadium redox flow battery; Sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone); Mesoporous silica; Hybrid membrane

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB220105, 2013CB934000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21273129, 20973099]
  3. Shenzhen Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [JC201104210149A]
  4. Shenzhen Basic Research Project [CXZZ20130322164607310, JCYJ20130402145002403, JCYJ20120830152316442]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hybrid membranes of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK) and mesoporous silica SBA-15 are prepared with various mass ratios for vanadium redox flow battery (VRB) application and investigated in detail. The hybrid membranes are dense and homogeneous with no visible hole as the SEM and EDX images shown. With the increasing of SBA-15 mass ratio, the physicochemical property, Vo(2+) permeability, mechanical property and thermal stability of hybrid membranes exhibit good trends, which can be attributed to the interaction between SPEEK and SBA-15. The hybrid membrane with 20 wt.% SBA-15 (termed as S/SBA-15 20) shows the VRB single cell performance of CE 96.3% and EE 88.1% at 60 mA cm(-2) due to its good balance of proton conductivity and Vo(2+) permeability, while Nafion 117 membrane shows the cell performance of CE 92.2% and EE 81.0%. Besides, the S/SBA-15 20 membrane shows stable cell performance of highly stable efficiency and slower discharge capacity decline during 120 cycles at 60 mA cm-2. Therefore, the SPEEK/SBA-15 hybrid membranes with optimized mass ratio and excellent VRB performance can be achieved, exhibiting good potential usage in VRB systems. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available