4.8 Review Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: A review of composite and metallic bipolar plates in proton exchange membrane fuel cell: Materials, fabrication, and material selection (Retracted article. See vol. 483, 2021)

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 265, Issue -, Pages 370-390

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.081

Keywords

Metallic bipolar plate; Composite bipolar plate; Proton exchange membrane fuel cell; Material selection

Funding

  1. Iran Renewable Energy Organization (SUNA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells offer exceptional potential for a clean, efficient, and reliable power source. The bipolar plate (BP) is a key component in this device, as it connects each cell electrically, supplies reactant gases to both anode and cathode, and removes reaction products from the cell. BPs have primarily been fabricated from high-density graphite, but in recent years, much attention has been paid to develop the cost-effective and feasible alternative materials. Recently, two different classes of materials have been attracted attention: metals and composite materials. This paper offers a comprehensive review of the current researches being carried out on the metallic and composite BPs, covering materials and fabrication methods. In this research, the phenomenon of ionic contamination due to the release of the corrosion products of metallic BP and relative impact on the durability as well as performance of PEM fuel cells is extensively investigated. Furthermore, in this paper, upon several effective parameters on commercialization of PEM fuel cells, such as stack cost, weight, volume, durability, strength, ohmic resistance, and ionic contamination, a material selection is performed among the most common BPs currently being used. This material selection is conducted by using Simple Additive Weighting Method (SAWM). (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available